Another TARP Spending Idea and Keynesian Economics

Will the federal government ever run out of TARP money? The latest proposal is to use $1.5 billion from that seemingly never-ending slush fund to prop up the mortgages of homeowners who either are unemployed or owe more on their house than it is worth. The money will be targeted to the five states which have seen the most dramatic (percentage-wise) decrease in home values: Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan and Nevada.

John Maynard Keynes

Earlier this month, President Obama proposed using $30 billion in funds paid back to TARP by banks to encourage “community” banks to lend to “small” businesses. A key point to remember is that all of these endless funds politicians seem to always find to spend represent money that the federal government doesn’t in fact have (given the massive federal debt). Basic economics, however, tells us that it has to come from somewhere. It will eventually be paid for through more inflationary money printing, increased debt or higher taxes — none of which are good for an economy in need of recovery.

The Keynesians will tell you that this amount of spending is necessary to “stimulate” the economy. They argue that when private-sector spending is down during an economic recession, the government has to step in and spend money to revitalize the economy. One basic problem with that logic: The money government spends has to come from the private sector through one way or another — either through borrowing, taxing or devaluing the currency through money printing.

All of this means less money available for those in the private sector to spend and more for government to redirect in the way it deems fit. That’s most likely why John Maynard Keynes’ economic theories appeal to those who have a predisposition to increase the power and scope of government (read: statists).

The last few years of “recovery” and “stimulus” plans from government have served as a good example of Keynesian economics in action.  Unfortunately, such flawed economic theorizing has real-world negative consequences for both Keynesians and non-Keynesians alike.

Advertisements

5 Responses to Another TARP Spending Idea and Keynesian Economics

  1. […] Another TARP Spending Idea and Keynesian Economics 2010 February 20 by psgsousf Adam Fowler for Adam Fowler’s Opinion Blog: […]

  2. […] Posted on ‘Scriptus’ My post from yesterday on TARP and Keynesian economic theory has also been posted on Scriptus. That is the blog for the […]

  3. […] least some sense of fiscal restraint. “We’re in a recession,” they argue. “The government has to spend money” (it doesn’t have). Would any reasonable head of a household argue that the way their […]

  4. […] Another TARP Spending Idea and Keynesian Economics […]

  5. Devin says:

    I’m sorry, but you obviously have very little comprehension of what Keynesian Theory entails so please stop writing about it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: