Paying for Spending Now Insignificant?

Somewhere along the line actually requiring government spending to be paid for went out of fashion. Take the case of Sen. Jim Bunning’s (R-KY) recent efforts to hold off another extension of unemployment benefits until Congress could lay out how it would pay for the extension.

Bunning’s efforts were at least temporarily successful, angering many lawmakers. A Fox News report quoted Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) lamenting Bunning’s actions by stating the following:

It is unthinkable, unforgivable that we would cut off unemployment insurance payments to these people, that we would cut off COBRA payments, which helps them to pay for their health insurance while they’re unemployed. … And yet, that’s what’s going to happen Sunday night. It’s because the senator from Kentucky has objected to extending unemployment insurance payments and COBRA health insurance payments for 30 days.

Bunning said he was concerned about the level of debt currently heaped up by the federal government. But those not phased by increased government spending (of money it doesn’t have) were fierce with their criticisms of the senator.

Take for example this segment from MSNBC making Bunning out to be little more than a heartless, bitter nut:

Personalities aside, it’s astounding to note the digression in respect for fiscal responsibility that has occurred in the federal government over the years. At one point, Thomas Jefferson noted the following:

The multiplication of public offices, increase of expense beyond income, growth and entailment of a public debt, are indications soliciting the employment of the pruning knife.

Either today’s politicians don’t care about our mounting federal debt, or they … well, don’t care. Nothing else really makes sense at this point.

7 Responses to Paying for Spending Now Insignificant?

  1. Sheryl says:

    Did this actually end up happening Sunday night???
    Adam, let me know!

  2. […] many continue to deride those who actually stand up and argue for at least some sense of fiscal restraint. “We’re in a recession,” […]

  3. I usually don’t ordinarily post on many another Blogs, still I just has to say thank you… keep up the amazing work. Ok regrettably its time to get to school.

  4. […] Paying for Spending Now Insignificant? (2/28/10) […]

  5. […] when is insisting on actually paying your bills considered “stubborn”? Since politicians decided they could win votes by making more […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: