Planned Parenthood and Grown-up Budgeting

Much debate took place around government funding to Planned Parenthood leading up to the prevented government “shutdown.” Many pro-lifers argued funding was going directly to fund abortions. Pro-choicers argued the federal money was separated from the money going to abortions. And budget hawks and libertarians argued government shouldn’t be subsidizing any of their services, regardless of the abortion issue.

Here are a few facts on the issue straight from Planned Parenthood itself:

  • Percent of Planned Parenthood revenue from government funding (FY 2008/2009) = 33% [source]
  • Abortion as percentage of all Planned Parenthood services (FY 2008/2009) = 3% [source]
  • Number of abortions performed by Planned Parenthood every hour (2009) = 38 [source]

In short, some of the figures thrown around have been exaggerated while others not raised should be a little disturbing. However, two points should be raised.

First, the claim that Planned Parenthood can somehow totally prevent government funding from supporting its abortion services is a little misleading. Money is fungible, and subsidizing one service leaves more money for them to provide another.

The other point is that we have a serious debt problem in our country. Defending funding to groups like Planned Parenthood to the point to threaten a government shutdown displays a total disregard for the enormity of our fiscal woes. If politicians are not willing to cut small amounts of funding like this, they are clearly not responsible enough to tackle our budgetary problems.

At some point, we and our elected officials have to act like adults and start making the hard, but necessary, cuts required to restore our government to fiscal sanity. No matter what is cut, there will be cries of it being unfair and harmful to people. To choose to not cut subsidies simply because it will offend those being subsidized is a sure path to not cutting anything.

It’s time for us to grow up. If we don’t, we’re destined for fiscal collapse.

2 Responses to Planned Parenthood and Grown-up Budgeting

  1. Tony Sidaway says:

    The Tea Partiers blinked so there won’t be a shutdown.

    It’s ironic to talk about fiscal responsibility in relation to health services. You know why those services are there in the first place, don’t you? Right, they’re there to keep people healthy and productive. A woman whose cancer isn’t caught early enough because you didn’t fund her pap smear becomes an economic burden rather than an asset. A woman who has an unwanted pregnancy because she missed her free contraceptives leaves the workforce. A mother who has a second or third child because she doesn’t have access to abortion falls deeper into poverty.

    False savings on basic health services like this do not help to reduce the deficit, they exacerbate it.

  2. David says:

    Until we have a serious talk about cutting the military budget in half and then another one on cutting the pentagon budget in half we need to leave the social nets that have provided care for 70 years for our citizens alone. Yes to spending cuts but do them into what will work for everyone. Go after the corporate greeds not the lowly’s needs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: