
Perhaps some perspective.
It’s official. Ratings agency Standard & Poor’s has downgraded their long-term credit rating for the U.S., noting in their report the following reasons:
… we believe that the prolonged controversy over raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate indicate that further near-term progress containing the growth in public spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an agreement on raising revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a contentious and fitful process. We also believe that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration agreed to this week falls short of the amount that we believe is necessary to stabilize the general government debt burden by the middle of the decade.
Hard to argue with. Even the party dubbed as deficit hawks, Republicans, have voiced skittishness over the possibility of defense spending cuts should the plan potentially emanating from the so-called “super” committee not pass.
The sad reality is that very few politicians are willing to make the cuts that are necessary to correct our ever-increasing path toward staggering debt (not that we aren’t already there). And if they’re not willing to make those cuts, the only other option is to “increase revenues,” which is code for raising taxes – something that is even less politically palatable. Yet even raising taxes on the “rich” isn’t enough to put the government in the black.
It’s easy to point the finger at our politicians. But they are just doing what they think will get them reelected, which means in most cases avoiding making tough decisions that might offend their constituents. Truth be told, it’s the electorate that is to blame for our mounting debt and near refusal to seriously deal with it (note: part of the S&P reasoning was that the amounts agreed on in the recent debt-ceiling deal are not anywhere near enough to tackle our long-term debt problems). As long as we the voters are unwilling to give up our particular piece(s) of the pie the government spending-machine cooks up, we will continue to face mounting debt and further credit worries.
“But what about cutting waste, fraud and abuse?” you might ask. One man’s “waste” is another man’s “investment.” One man’s “fraud” is another man’s “tax credit.” And one man’s “abuse” is another man’s “grant” or “entitlement” or whatever other euphemism he may choose at any given moment to justify his looting of other people’s money.
We are all part of the problem. The sooner we realize that the better.
Much debate took place around government funding to Planned Parenthood leading up to the prevented government “shutdown.” Many pro-lifers argued funding was going directly to fund abortions. Pro-choicers argued the federal money was separated from the money going to abortions. And budget hawks and libertarians argued government shouldn’t be subsidizing any of their services, regardless of the abortion issue.
Here are a few facts on the issue straight from Planned Parenthood itself:
In short, some of the figures thrown around have been exaggerated while others not raised should be a little disturbing. However, two points should be raised.
It’s always good to learn a foreign language. I hear it helps your employment prospects?

As an objection lesson, below is a list of health plans that have been granted waivers from the requirement in the new healthcare ‘reform’ law ending yearly benefit limits. There are two main problems with this scenario. One is that it flies in the face of the promise that Americans would be able to keep their existent health insurance plans if they want to. The other is that it grants the authority to an appointed, unelected government official – the Health and Human Services Secretary – to simply exempt certain companies from a law.
While you think about those issues, gaze upon this list of over 700 plans that have been granted waivers (Warning: It’s long!):
A key word to look for in not only tonight’s State of the Union address but virtually every other political speech is the word ‘invest.’ Invest is a commonly used euphemism used by politicians to describe what programs they want to spend taxpayer money on. The key is that no matter how they use it, it always really means “spend.”
If they the support the program, they want to ‘invest’ government resources in it. If they oppose it, they call it “spending.”
Nothing really changes in the words (read: euphemisms) used in these speeches, just the mouths speaking them.
For more on government ‘investing’ in dubious programs it can’t afford to fund, click here.
As can be expected, pundits and idealogues have capitalized on a tragedy to support their political aims and cast their political opponents in a bad light. Despite still not having an accurate picture of the beliefs motivating a clearly disturbed individual, many in the media have been all too quick to place the blame on the recent tragedy in Arizona on what they view as hateful and violent rhetoric from those on the right of the political spectrum.
It’s a tried and true tactic of politics to shut down opposition speech by demonizing those speaking. One variant of this tactic is to call the speakers racist. The variant used in the case of the Arizona shootings has been to demonize the speech itself as somehow leading to violence.
It’s a shame such a sad event has been twisted by some to score political points. But that’s the sad state affairs that is politics in an era when increased government intervention in our lives is the trend. As the amount of activities regulated by government increases, so does the amount of activities that become politicized. Now every event in our lives, including terrible events like this, are subject to partisan politicization.
May our prayers be with the victims and their families. And may our partisan attacks take a much-needed break.
In celebration of the New Year, here are the top 10 posts from this blog for 2010:
Have a Happy New Year!
This blog will be on somewhat of a hiatus during the holiday season. So, Merry Christmas and have a Happy New Year!
“Our new Constitution is now established, and has an appearance that promises permanency; but in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.”
– Benjamin Franklin